PROGRAMME NEWS

Latin American Thinks Tanks: Elections, Impact Evaluations, South-South Cooperation

Think tank summit 2_nov_arg_4

I attended the Third Latin American Think Tank Summit 11-13 November, in Buenos Aires – to share lessons from ELLA’s support for think tanks/research centres on joint comparative research for policy purposes.

It was a fascinating two days, hosted by two of Argentina’s leading think tanks, CIPPEC (an ELLA partner) and CARI, and the larger than life figure of Professor James McGann, the power behind the University of Pennsylvania’s annual global Go To Think Tank ranking report.  Forty or so think tanks were present from across the continent, including five of ELLA’s six Latin American partners,  so this was a great opportunity for a rapid tour of the Latin American panorama.

Elections

Most striking for me was the session on ‘think tanks and electoral processes’.  In country after country, these leading think tanks have played a prominent role in organising and structuring electoral debates, typically between Presidential candidates.  ASIES in Guatemala, CADEP in Paraguay and Grupo Faro (and ELLA partner) in Ecuador recounted their experiences in organising present and past TV debates.  CIES in Peru, a consortium of research centres and think tanks, has also long played this role.  And CIPPEC , apart from organising the TT Summit, was a force behind the second round run-off debate two days after the Summit, between Argentine Presidential candidates, Mauricio Macri and Daniel Scioli.

It occurs to me that these Latin American think tanks play a more direct role in the electoral processes of their countries, than their counterparts in the Anglo-Saxon ‘North’.  This is a distinct and noteworthy contribution to the debate of evidence-based policies, even where candidates frequently resort to the rhetorical instincts of politicians everywhere.  In countries where democracy and high quality news reporting are less rooted, these think tanks have filled a valuable niche in promoting democratic consideration of policies. If it has not been done already, it would be interesting to do a process trace on some of these cases, to discern impacts.

Impact Evaluations

Latin America’s growth prospects have deteriorated a lot in the last two years.  But many Summit participants saw this as an opportunity to further public policy reforms.  Attention to the monitoring and evaluation of public policies and programmes is growing in many countries across the region; GRADE (an ELLA partner) reported on recent experiences in Peru.  And even though governments tend to want to listen to and publish the good news, impact evaluations are also increasingly widespread – with the pace set by Mexico and Brazil’s Conditional Cash Transfer programmes.  Evaluation is one of the four pillars of CAF’s modernisation of the state agenda, and think tanks across the region have a key role to play in supporting rigorous evidence-based impact evaluations.

Think tank summit 2_nov_arg_2-sliderSouth-South Cooperation

I participated in a session on south-south cooperation between think tanks, along with IEP (Peru), the Asian Development Bank Institute, and ARU (Bolivia). Interesting initiatives include ILAIPP, a network of research centres from seven Latin American countries, devoted to collaborative research on issues of regional importance.

Drawing on the experience in ELLA, I focused on some of the key principles for successful joint research between geographically dispersed think tanks:

  • Know thy partner: their agenda, their values, their governance and transparency, their commitment to quality of evidence
  • Assure quality, the bedrock of think tank respectability: design your research well, with clear agreed research questions, and appropriate design and methodologies; maybe seek to complement each other’s strengths for qualitative and qualitative research – mixed methods stories are often much stronger
  • Pay attention to the comparative framework: to compatible methods and data sources, where possible; identifying and isolating contextual variables
  • Recognise and address the challenge of virtual distance: mix your communication methods (mail, phone, video conferencing, face to face), choosing the appropriate method for the task
  • Promote inter-dependence: to build and strengthen the relationship

My thanks to CIPPEC, CARI, FGV and the University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Society Programme (CCSTP) for organising such a stimulating two days.

Mark Lewis, Director, ELLA

Photo credits:

Author: CIPPEC

Share this page:
Latest news:

[ELLA Community blog series] Pastoralism and Culture in Karamoja Region

[ELLA Community blog series] Where is the Problem? Skepticism about Uganda’s “Oil 2020″ dream

Community scorecards for Cape Town’s townships

Using water efficiently to tackle climate challenges in Nepal

A climate change action plan for Kenya

Alternatives for citizen oversight in the Delta State, Nigeria

Accessing Cameroon’s Forestry Information

Policymakers and practitioners meet in South Africa to Exchange knowledge on informality in Africa and Latin America

Unusual comparative research and learning between countries (Evidence Week – Lima, Peru)

Leapfrogging for law improvement in Togo

ELLA Outreach

Advocating for contract farming in Nigeria

Land use policy in Myanmar

From Peruvian potatoes to Ugandan coffee

Kids Prepared For Disasters

Being a better advocate locally by looking internationally

Chuluke Chuluke: Community Radio and Agricultural Policy Making in Malawi

New ELLA Learning Alliances Now Open for Registration

Fruits from Comparing Apples and Oranges

How to improve your Research User Ratings

How do you compare Latin American and African development experiences?

How to measure impact of south-south research and knowledge exchange initiatives?

ELLA Research: Infographic

Interview with Akosua Darkwah

ELLA Infographic

ELLA: FUNDAR, Mexico’s perspective (video)

ELLA through our partner´s eyes (Video)

ELLA Comparative Research: One Year In

The evolution of the ELLA programme